The hard truth is: You cannot replicate the "Excel Analyst Experience" for them. If you try to give them a "dump" export, they will feel blind. If you give them a login, they will feel overwhelmed.
Here is the specific use case I’d think of:
1. Pivot to "Auditability" (The Governance Flex) : Investors check formulas in Excel because they are terrified of hardcoded numbers and broken links.
-
The Move: Instead of showing them a formula, show them the History/Audit Log.
-
Sample Pitch: "In Excel, you can't tell if I hardcoded this number last night. In Pigment, every single data point has a timestamped audit trail. The logic is locked down, so there are no broken links."
-
Why it works: It replaces their need to check the math with the assurance that the math cannot be tampered with.
2. The "Driver-Based" Export (Not just a dump) Don't just export a P&L. Create a specific view in Pigment designed for export that puts the Input right next to the Output.
-
Bad Export: Just the Revenue line.
-
Good Export: Column A (Price) | Column B (Volume) | Column C (Revenue).
-
Even though there is no formula in Cell C, the investor can visually scan A * B = C and see the logic holds. This is usually all they are actually looking for—proof that the drivers are driving the outcome.
3. The "Guided" Sandbox If they are truly doing deep Due Diligence, get on a call and give them the wheel.
-
Don't just demo it. Open a Scenario, share your screen, and say: "You tell me what to type."
-
When they dictate a change and see the Balance Sheet balance instantly, that builds more confidence than an INDEX/MATCH formula ever could.
Bottom line: I think we might have to stop apologising for not having Excel modelling look alike because we are not working on Excel spreadsheet. We might have to define Pigment as an improved tier of financial governance that protects their investment better than a spreadsheet can.